4.3 Article

Voices represented and voices silenced: Represented voices in the media coverage of the implementation of a supervised injecting facility

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104213

Keywords

Medically supervised injecting rooms; Drug consumption rooms; News media; Policy making; Harm reduction; Drug policy; Stigma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the representation and silencing of voices in the print news media regarding the first medically supervised injecting room in Victoria. The study finds that politicians largely focus on the rhetoric of "saving lives" while voices of people who inject drugs are inadequately represented and instead portrayed in a negative manner. The imbalanced reporting may have implications on the social status and drug policy of this population.
Background: Victoria's first medically supervised injecting room (MSIR) has remained controversial despite mounting evidence in support of the facility. The opposition to a policy idea is subject to a myriad of factors including the media. Favouring the opinions of various actors, the media are a fundamental element of the narrative formation process. In this article, we examine the voices represented and voice silenced in print news media and the possible effects of such reporting.Methods: A quantitative content and qualitative thematic analysis of Victorian print media (n=645) focusing on the implementation and continued operation of North Richmond Community Health's medically supervised injecting room was conducted.Results: The representations of the MSIR were debated by three predominant actors - politicians, public, and residents. Politicians largely relied on the 'saving lives' rhetoric when supporting the facility. In addition, competing representations of 'public amenity' were presented by both advocates and proponents of the MSIR. We found the voices of people who inject drugs were inadequately represented within the data. Instead, overdose statistics were featured as were discursive descriptions of people who inject drugs such as 'addicts', 'junkies', and 'druggies'.Conclusion: Despite people who inject drugs being the population the MSIR is designed to benefit, their experiences and voices were lacking, highlighting social power structures, denying the silenced power, and obstructing social change. Overdose rates were consistently presented as numbers, negating personal experiences and lacking meaningful debate. Further, negative discourse referring to people who inject drugs may have implications regarding internalised and externalised stigma and drug policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available