4.6 Article

Burned agricultural biomass, air pollution and crime

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102887

Keywords

Air pollution; Stubble burning; Violence; Crime; Environment and development; Burned biomass; Wind; Smog

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agricultural fires result in half the amount of burned biomass compared to forest fires, but the social costs of burned biomass, including air pollution and the increase in crime, are significant. This study provides evidence on the causal relationship between air pollution and crime using the increased rice stubble burning in Pakistan as a natural experiment. The findings show that air pollution increases all crimes, with particular emphasis on violent crimes. Reduction in earnings for middle-aged and older male individuals is identified as an important potential mechanism, and psychological factors are also discussed. The social costs of burned agricultural biomass have wide-ranging implications for developing economies reliant on agriculture.
Agricultural fires account for half as much burned biomass as forest fires. Like other forms of environmental degradation, burned biomass incurs social costs for society through its contribution to air pollution. One such potential cost is the increase in crime. Exploiting plausibly exogenous variation in air pollution due to increased rice stubble burning in Pakistan, I provide evidence on the causal relationship between air pollution and crime. Air pollution increases all crimes, but the increase in violent crimes is particularly salient. I provide evidence that a reduction in earnings for middle-aged and older male individuals is an important potential mechanism. I also discuss the potential psychological mechanisms involved. The social costs of burned agricultural biomass are much wider and have significant implications for developing economies that rely on agriculture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available