4.7 Article

A spatio-temporal approach to population diversity: Immigration and rural areas in France

Journal

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103099

Keywords

International migration; Immigration; Rural areas; Diversity; Place trajectories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides a spatiotemporal analysis of population diversity in French rural areas between 1975 and 2015, taking into account the weight of the immigrant population and the variety of countries of birth. The study highlights the dominant diversification trajectories in the French countryside over the past forty years, but also reveals variations in pace and intensity based on the economic and demographic characteristics of the territories and their migration history. It emphasizes the importance of considering temporalities of social change in informing local public action on social integration.
This article provides a spatiotemporal analysis of population diversity in French rural areas between 1975 and 2015 by considering the weight of the immigrant population and the variety of countries of birth of this population. It is based on a quantitative and longitudinal analysis of detailed data from the 1975, 1999, 2008 and 2015 population censuses. The originality of this article lies in a global approach to the different types of migration and the analysis of the trajectories of local territories over time. With this approach, the article shows that diversification trajectories have been dominant in the French countryside for the past forty years, but also that they have varied in pace and intensity according to the economic and demographic characteristics of the territories and their migration history. Taking into account these temporalities of social change is therefore essential to inform local public action on social integration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available