4.7 Article

Leveraging realities of saving energy at home: Contributions of co-design to behavioural interventions

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103258

Keywords

Energy; Co -design; Apps; Behaviour change

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study argues that co-design is suitable for addressing the challenges of climate-relevant behavior change and proposes an abductive co-design methodology based on the Model of Action Phases (MAP) framework. The methodology involves collaborating with household members to design an energy savings app and behavior change intervention. Through this process, participants' motivations, real-life challenges, and knowledge gaps are identified, leading to inputs that address socio-psychological gaps and progress behavior change through the MAP's action phases.
While reducing individual energy consumption contributes to climate change mitigation, many individuals who share this belief fail to act on it. While behavioural interventions try to address such intention-behaviour gaps, few approaches have worked with consumers to understand the realities of their opportunities and limitations to save energy at home. We argue that co-design is well-suited to address the unique challenges of climate-relevant behaviour change and propose an abductive co-design methodology to develop a behavioural intervention with household members based on the Model of Action Phases (MAP) framework. We implement the methodology to design an energy savings app and behaviour change intervention in Switzerland. The methodology shifts participants into an expert role and elucidates their motivations, real-life challenges, and knowledge gaps to save energy. Through group problem-solving and self-reflection, participants provided design inputs which address the socio-psychological gaps to progress behaviour through the preaction, action and postaction phases of the MAP. We assess the originality and feasibility of the co-design inputs, as well as reflect on the experience of the researchers and participants during the process. We conclude that co-design provided novel inputs relevant for progressing through the behaviour change stages identified by the MAP framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available