4.3 Article

COVID Protection Behaviors, Mental Health, Risk Perceptions, and Control Beliefs: A Dynamic Temporal Network Analysis of Daily Diary Data

Journal

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaad050

Keywords

COVID-19; Depression; Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions; Social Distancing; Mask-Wearing; Hand Hygiene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the COVID-19 pandemic, behavioral non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as social distancing and hygiene measures were widely implemented. However, the relationship between adherence to NPIs, mental health symptoms, and health-related cognitions is complex and not well understood. This study aims to examine the associations between mental health, health-related cognitions, and NPI adherence using ecological momentary assessment.
Background To control infections, behavioral non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as social distancing and hygiene measures (masking, hand hygiene) were implemented widely during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, adherence to NPIs has also been implied in an increase in mental health problems. However, the designs of many existing studies are often poorly suited to disentangle complex relationships between NPI adherence, mental health symptoms, and health-related cognitions (risk perceptions, control beliefs).Purpose To separate between- and temporal within-person associations between mental health, health-related cognitions, and NPI adherence.Methods Six-month ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with six 4-day assessment bouts in 397 German adults. Daily measurement of adherence, mental health symptoms, and cognitions during bouts. We used dynamic temporal network analysis to estimate between-person, as well as contemporaneous and lagged within-person effects for distancing and hygiene NPIs.Results Distinct network clusters of mental health, health cognitions, and adherence emerged. Participants with higher control beliefs and higher susceptibility were also more adherent (between-person perspective). Within-person, similar findings emerged, additionally, distancing and loneliness were associated. Lagged findings suggest that better adherence to NPIs was associated with better mental health on subsequent days, whereas higher loneliness was associated with better subsequent hygiene adherence.Conclusions Findings suggest no negative impact of NPI adherence on mental health or vice versa, but instead suggest that adherence might improve mental health symptoms. Control beliefs and risk perceptions are important covariates of adherence-both on between-person and within-person level. Adhering to COVID protective behaviors might be less detrimental for mental health than some previous claims: Over 6 months in 2021-2022, adults from Germany who adhered to COVID protection recommendations (mask-wearing, hand hygiene, social distancing) on any one day reported better mental health the following days.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available