4.3 Article

Sex Moderates the Relationship Between Social Support and Cardiovascular Prevention Behaviors in Middle-aged and Older Adults

Journal

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue 10, Pages 877-887

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaad030

Keywords

Social support; Cardiovascular disease; Prevention; Adherence; Lifestyle; Screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined whether social support has equal benefits for adherence to cardiovascular prevention recommendations for men and women. The results showed that social support is more strongly associated with adherence to cardiovascular prevention recommendations in men than in women. Specifically, low social support levels were detrimental for middle-aged and older men, whereas older women had high adherence unrelated to social support.
Background Most risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are modifiable, suggesting that the burden of CVD could be substantially reduced through cardiovascular screening and healthier lifestyle. People who have social support are more likely to adhere to cardiovascular prevention recommendations, but it is not clear whether the benefit of social support is equal for men and women. Purpose We investigated whether sex moderates the relationship between social support and adherence to cardiovascular prevention recommendations in a nationally representative sample. Methods Participants were 17,287 adults (n = 10,264 middle-aged adults 40-64 years old and n = 7,023 older adults & GE; 65 years old) who participated in the National Health Survey of Spain in 2017. Social support was measured with the Functional Social Support Questionnaire of Duke-UNC. Adherence to cardiovascular screening recommendations was assessed based on self-reported testing of cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar by a health professional in the past 12 months. Adherence to recommended health-related behaviors was assessed based on the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology regarding diet, alcohol consumption, smoking, and physical activity. Results Multiple regression models adjusted for socio-demographic and cardiovascular history and risk variables showed that social support was more strongly associated with adherence to cardiovascular prevention recommendations in men than in women. In particular, low social support levels were especially detrimental for both middle-aged men (screening: B = 0.13, 95% CI [0.06-0.20], p < .001; behaviors: B = 0.33 [0.26-0.41], p < .001) and older men (screening: B = 0.10 [0.04-0.17], p = .001; behaviors: B = 0.16 [0.08-0.25], p < .001), whereas older women had comparatively high adherence, which was unrelated to social support (screening: B = 0.02 [-0.03 to 0.08], p = .433; behaviors: B = 0.03 [-0.03 to 0.10], p = .342). Conclusions Social support is more strongly associated with cardiovascular prevention in men than in women, such that men who lack social support have the lowest adherence to cardiovascular screening and lifestyle recommendations. Lay Summary To help prevent cardiovascular disease, experts recommend screening for cardiovascular risk factors and leading a healthy lifestyle. Previous research has found that people who have social support are more likely to adhere to such cardiovascular prevention recommendations. In this study, using data form a nationally representative survey, we investigated whether the relationship between social support and adherence to cardiovascular prevention recommendations is different for men and women. Participants were 17,287 adults from the National Health Survey of Spain, who reported their cardiovascular screening history (i.e., whether they had their cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar levels tested by a health professional in the past 12 months) and their lifestyle habits regarding diet, alcohol consumption, smoking, and physical activity. Social support was more strongly associated with cardiovascular prevention in men than in women, such that men who lacked social support had the lowest adherence to cardiovascular screening and lifestyle recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available