4.5 Article

Ferroptosis is involved in passive Heymann nephritis in rats

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21050

Keywords

Ferroptosis; Ferritinophagy; Passive Heymann nephritis; Membranous nephropathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the involvement of ferroptosis in the pathological damage of membranous nephropathy, accompanied by the activation of ferritinophagy.
Ferroptosis is found to be involved in some experimental models of kidney diseases, but its role in membrane nephropathy (MN) is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore whether ferroptosis occurred in MN, and the role of ferritinophagy. In this study, passive Heymann nephritis (PHN) rats were induced by single tail vein injection of anti-Fx1A serum, and normal rats were used as control. The changes of 24 h urinary protein, serum biochemical parameters, renal pathological damage, iron content, lipid peroxidation parameters, ferroptosis markers, and ferritinophagy markers were evaluated in the two groups. Compared with the control group, PHN rats showed obvious proteinuria, hypoproteinemia, and hyperlipidemia. Besides, more severe renal pathological damage and higher Fe2+ levels were observed in PHN rats, and the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) increased significantly, while the levels of superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH) decreased. In addition, the expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) in renal tissues of PHN rats decreased significantly, while the expression of transferrin receptor (TFR) and acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) increased. The expression of microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) II/LC3I and nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) increased significantly. Therefore, our study shows that ferroptosis is involved in the pathological damage of MN, and companied by activation of ferritinophagy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available