4.5 Article

Three-dimensional strength reduction and two-dimensional limit equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17966

Keywords

Displacement; Factor of safety; FEM; FLAC3D; LEM; Stability analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, cut slopes were analyzed using the 2D limit equilibrium method (LEM) and the 3D strength reduction method (SRM) with numerical software. Representative soil samples were collected for laboratory tests to determine input parameters. The analysis showed that the factor of safety (FOS) for 2D analysis was higher than that for 3D analysis.
Landslides caused tremendous damage to the life and properties of society. In this study, cut slopes were analyzed using the two-dimensional (2D) limit equilibrium method (LEM) by slope/w software and a three-dimensional (3D) strength reduction method (SRM) by using Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions (FLAC3D), which is a finite difference method (FDM) numerical software. Analysis of the slope is done by representative soil samples collected and transported to the laboratory to determine input parameters like unit weight (& gamma;), shear strength parameters (c,& phi;), and the water level position. Strength parameters were determined from direct shear tests for cohesionless soil and consolidated undrained (CU) triaxial tests for cohesive soils. For 2D analysis, the factor of safety (FOS) was calculated for the condition of dry and maximum water levels using Morgenstern-price methods, and the analysis gave FOS 0.743 and 0.614 for the dry and maximum water level conditions, respectively; for SRM, the input parameters of bulk and shear modulus (B, G) which were determined from the empirical equation using modulus of elasticity(E) and Poisson's ratio(v). Moreover, v were adjusted according to the principle of & phi;-v inequality. For 2D analysis, FOS were 0.743 and 0.614 for dry and maximum water levels using Morgenstern-price methods, whereas 3D analysis gave FOS 0.34 and 0.31 for dry and maximum water levels, respectively. From the analysis, it is concluded that 2D LEM is given higher FOS than 3D FDM. Moreover, the 3D analysis showed that velocity and displacement in the lateral Y direction were minimal and maximum in the horizontal X direction. The maximum horizontal velocity for the respective dry and maximum water level conditions gave 6.64*10-4 m/step and 6.04*10-4 m/step and maximum horizontal displacement 7.36 m and 6.06 m for dry and maximum water levels, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available