☆ 4.7 Article

Co-opted board, environment, social and governance

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Business, Finance

Stock price reactions to ESG news: the role of ESG ratings and disagreement

George Serafeim et al.

Summary: This study investigates whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings can predict future ESG news and market reactions. The findings suggest that consensus rating can predict future news, but its predictive ability weakens for firms with larger rating disagreements. The relationship between news and market reactions is moderated by the consensus rating. In the presence of high rating disagreements, the relationship weakens, while the rating with the highest predictive power can forecast future stock returns. Overall, while rating disagreements hinder the incorporation of value-relevant ESG news into prices, ratings can predict future news and proxy for market expectations.

REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

The end of ESG

Alex Edmans

Summary: ESG is important because it is critical to long-term value and should be taken seriously by all, not just those specifically studying or working with ESG. It doesn't require a specialized term as considering long-term factors is simply part of investing, not niche ESG investing. ESG is not more special than other intangible assets that contribute to long-term financial and social returns.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Renewable Governance: Good for the Environment?

Alexander Dyck et al.

Summary: We suggest that board renewal mechanisms are necessary to address the inconsistency between investor preferences for environmental sustainability and firms' actual practices. Majority voting for directors and the inclusion of a female director are two corporate governance mechanisms that can effectively influence a board's thinking on sustainability. Through our study of 3,293 firms from 41 countries and the examination of quasi-exogenous shocks in Canada and France, we find that both board renewal mechanisms are associated with significantly improved future environmental performance. Additional tests indicate that board renewal has a stronger impact on environmental performance in settings with better institutions and more motivated institutional investors. These findings emphasize the importance of board renewal in aligning firm policies with investor preferences worldwide.

JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Co-opted board and firm climate change risk

Abdul Ghafoor et al.

Summary: This paper examines whether a higher proportion of co-opted board members following a CEO's accession translates to greater climate change-related risk for the firm. Investigating 12,101 US-based firm-year observations from 2001 to 2014, we discover that firms with a higher level of coopted directors face higher climate risk. This conclusion survives a battery of tests addressing reverse causality, omitted variable bias, and sample selection bias. We touch on this result's implications and offer further ideas for advancing the discourse.

FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Director Expertise and Corporate Sustainability

Peter Iliev et al.

Summary: We find that US firms enhance their sustainability performance by 7.1% when their directors gain expertise through exposure to sustainability reforms in foreign countries where they serve as directors. This improvement is observed in both environmental and social practices. Furthermore, the impact of boards on sustainability is stronger for firms in clean industries and those facing fewer operational and financial constraints.

REVIEW OF FINANCE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Co-opted boards and earnings management: Evidence of reduced short-termist behavior

Oneil Harris et al.

Summary: This study contributes to the literature on board co-option by examining the influence of co-opted directors on managers' attitudes towards earnings management. The findings provide robust evidence that co-option mitigates both real activities and accrual-based earnings management, reducing managerial short-termism and enhancing job security. Also, the study shows that a higher degree of co-option lowers the likelihood of the CEO being forcefully removed from office for managing earnings.

BRQ-BUSINESS RESEARCH QUARTERLY (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance

Tamas Barko et al.

Summary: The study found that behind-the-scenes investor activism promoting environmental, social, and governance (ESG) improvements has a positive impact on the ESG performance of target companies. Successful activism boosts the sales of target companies and is profitable for the investors involved.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Do Co-opted boards affect the cost of equity capital?

Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan et al.

Summary: This paper finds a negative association between board co-option and the cost of equity capital, indicating that board co-option can help reduce companies' cost of equity.

FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Board co-option and employee welfare

Yuka Nishikawa et al.

Summary: The study finds that firms with a higher proportion of co-opted directors on their boards are less committed to employee welfare. This suggests that the interests of co-opted directors are more aligned with the CEO's interests, compromising their monitoring role.

MANAGERIAL FINANCE (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

ESG activities and firm cash flow

Richard Paul Gregory

Summary: I study the impact of ESG activities on Free Cash Flow to the Firm and Free Cash Flow to Equity. My findings show that ESG activities primarily benefit the cash flows to creditors of firms in developed markets. This effect is mainly driven by the excessive spending of firms on communicating their integration of economic, social, and environmental dimensions into their decision-making processes. Moreover, for developed market firms, excessive spending on workforce conditions also plays a role in boosting Free Cash Flow to the Firm.

GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Director co-option and the cash conversion cycle

Oneil Harris et al.

Summary: This study finds that co-opted boards can reduce the cash conversion cycle and improve working capital management efficiency. Co-option reduces managerial myopic behavior and motivates better investment decisions.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

ESG scores and target price accuracy: Evidence from sell-side recommendations in BRICS

Muhammad Umar et al.

Summary: This paper examines the relationship between ESG scores and the target price precision of sell-side analysts, finding that higher ESG scores positively impact target price accuracy.

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Director co-option and future market share growth

Oneil Harris et al.

Summary: This paper examines the impact of director co-option on product market outcomes. The study reveals that future market share growth decreases as executives co-opt more directors. Additionally, co-opted directors hinder the benefits of cash reserves in the product market. Results also demonstrate that co-option leads to lower market share gains among firms with intense product changes and higher borrowing capacity compared to their competitors.

NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic

Wenzhi Ding et al.

Summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, companies with stronger financial positions, less exposure to global supply chains and customer locations, more corporate social responsibility activities, and fewer entrenched executives performed better in terms of stock returns. On the other hand, companies with greater ownership by hedge funds and other asset management companies showed worse performance.

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Fiduciary duty or loyalty? Evidence from co-opted boards and corporate misconduct

Rashid Zaman et al.

Summary: The presence of co-opted directors in a board exacerbates the incidence of corporate misconduct, leading to a significant positive relationship. Co-opted directors propose fewer board agenda items, have lower attendance at board meetings, and receive compensation packages exceeding industry norms, worsening stakeholder-agency conflicts.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Socially responsible corporate customers *

Rui Dai et al.

Summary: Corporate customers have a unilateral effect on suppliers' CSR and influence them through positive assortative matching and decision-making processes. Enhanced collaborative CSR efforts improve operational efficiency and firm valuation for both customers and suppliers, but only increase customers' future sales growth.

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Kee-Hong Bae et al.

Summary: The study found that corporate social responsibility (CSR) did not affect stock returns during the market crash induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, but there was a more positive relationship between CSR and stock returns when CSR was congruent with a firm's institutional environment.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Business, Finance

Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance

Stuart L. Gillan et al.

Summary: This paper reviews financial economics-based research on ESG and CSR, with a focus on corporate finance. While some studies have shown a strong relationship between a firm's ESG/CSR profile and activities and its market, leadership, owner characteristics, risk, performance, and value, there are still conflicting hypotheses and unresolved issues requiring further research.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Do co-opted boards strategically choose LGBT-supportive policies?

Khine Kyaw et al.

Summary: This study found that co-opted boards are more likely to adopt LGBT-supportive policies that address internal stakeholders, and management of co-opted boards implementing these policies experience higher compensation increases. However, during the global financial crisis, co-opted boards were less inclined to adopt LGBT-supportive policies.

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

The bright side of co-opted boards: Evidence from firm innovation

Lily Nguyen et al.

Summary: This study demonstrates that co-opted boards have a positive and robust impact on firm innovation, particularly driven by co-opted independent directors. Companies with more co-opted independent directors have lower sensitivities of CEO pay and turnover to performance, indicating that co-opted boards promote innovation by mitigating managers' career concerns and supporting incentive contracts for innovation. Overall, the study provides new evidence that co-opted boards benefit firm innovation.

FINANCIAL REVIEW (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Resiliency of Environmental and Social Stocks: An Analysis of the Exogenous COVID-19 Market Crash

Rui Albuquerque et al.

REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Business

The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review

Samuel Drempetic et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Board co-option and default risk

Ghasan A. Baghdadi et al.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Management

Peer Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility

Jie Cao et al.

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Management

Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Rui Albuquerque et al.

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds

Olivier David Zerbib

JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Do co-opted boards enhance or reduce R&D productivity?

Oneil Harris et al.

NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Do Co-Opted Directors Influence Dividend Policy?

Pornsit Jiraporn et al.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Economics

Corporate social responsibility and product quality

Aleix Calveras et al.

JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Management

Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany

Patrick Velte

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis

Karl V. Lins et al.

JOURNAL OF FINANCE (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Business

The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View

Jeremy Galbreath

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms

Paul B. McGuinness et al.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance

Amama Shaukat et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Socially responsible firms

Allen Ferrell et al.

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Do co-opted directors mitigate managerial myopia? Evidence from R&D investments

Pandej Chintrakarn et al.

FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility

Maretno Harjoto et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility

Ali Fatemi et al.

JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE (2015)

Add to Collection

Review Business, Finance

The wages of social responsibility - where are they? A critical review of ESG investing

Gerhard Halbritter et al.

REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Firms' earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation

Lei Gao et al.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Management

Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital

Sudheer Chava

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Business

'Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees' collectivist orientation'

Mariam Farooq et al.

EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests

Richard Borghesi et al.

JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Co-opted Boards

Jeffrey L. Coles et al.

REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility

Alberta Di Giuli et al.

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Management

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness

Henri Servaes et al.

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era

Jason Q. Zhang et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Business

The Link Between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, With Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility

Alex Edmans

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance

M. Babajide Wintoki et al.

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility

Hoje Jo et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices

Alex Edmans

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?

Sadok El Ghoul et al.

JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Business

Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus

Maretno A. Harjoto et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Business

The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation

Stephen Bear et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS (2010)

Add to Collection

Article Business, Finance

The Wages of Social Responsibility

Meir Statman et al.

FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL (2009)

Add to Collection

Review Business, Finance

The economic implications of corporate financial reporting

JR Graham et al.

JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS (2005)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.