4.7 Article

Testing for integration and cointegration when time series are observed with noise

Journal

ECONOMIC MODELLING
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106352

Keywords

Filtering; Cointegration; Unit root; Stationarity; Electricity prices; Pairs trading

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The popular ADF unit root test and Johansen's cointegration test are prone to overestimation when applied to time series observed with noise. This study demonstrates why this occurs and presents three different filtering approaches that can significantly improve the performance of these tests on noisy data without affecting their properties on noise-free observations. The study also provides real-world applications to showcase the impact of using filtered time series on conclusions regarding wholesale electricity prices in European countries and pairs trading strategies based on spurious cointegrating relations among stock prices.
When time series are observed with noise, the popular Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root test and Johansen's cointegration test are oversized: the ADF tends to conclude for stationarity too often and Johansen's test finds too many cointegrating relations. This fact is well-known but no simple solution has been proposed in the literature. In this work, we show why this happens and prove theoretically and by Monte Carlo simulations how three different filtering approaches can significantly improve the performance of the two tests applied to noisy data without harming their properties when observations are free from noise. We show how conclusions can change when using filtered time series in two real applications: one concerning wholesale electricity prices in European countries, and the second warning against pairs trading strategies based on spurious cointegrating relations among stock prices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available