Journal
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 882-885Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw092
Keywords
evidence-based medicine; heterogeneity; limitations; meta-analysis; publication bias
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Meta-analysis, a statistical combination of results of several trials to produce a summary effect, has been subject to criticism in the past, mainly for the reasons of poor quality of included studies, heterogeneity between studies meta-analyzed and failing to address publication bias. These limitations can cause the results to be misleading, which is important if policy and practice decisions are based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We elaborate on these limitations and illustrate them with examples from the nephrology literature. Finally, we present some potential solutions, notably, education in meta-analysis for evidence producers and consumers as well as the use of individual patient data for meta-analyses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available