Falling for Tourist Scams: An Examination of Scam Compliance Factors

Understanding how tourists respond to and comply with scams sheds light on tourist self-protection. In this study, a quasi-experimental design was employed to examine external (scam-operation) and internal (personal) factors of scam compliance. Twelve (3 x 4) scenarios were developed from real-world tourist scam cases and presented in the form of videos in an online tourist survey to elicit and observe decisions. A total of 609 participants from Australia and China completed the task, and the data were analyzed through multiple statistical techniques. The results suggested that the external factors of scam compliance did not exert a significant impact. Three internal factors, sensation-seeking, travel experiences, and risk perception, are stronger predictors of scam compliance. This study offers theoretical insights into tourist behavior, and contributes to new understandings of the antecedents of scam compliance.

Automated summary

Understanding tourist responses to scams can provide insights into self-protection. This study used a quasi-experimental design to examine both external and internal factors of scam compliance. The results showed that internal factors such as sensation-seeking, travel experiences, and risk perception were stronger predictors of scam compliance compared to external factors. This research contributes to our understanding of tourist behavior and the factors influencing scam compliance.