Worldwide Well-Being: Simulated Twins Reveal Genetic and (Hidden) Environmental Influences

What are the major sources of worldwide variability in subjective well-being (SWB)? Twin and family studies of SWB have found substantial heritability and strong effects from unique environments but virtually no effects from shared environments. However, extant findings are not necessarily valid at the global level. Prior studies have examined within-countries variability but did not take into account mean differences across nations. In this article, we aim to estimate the effects of genetic factors, individual environmental exposures, and shared environments for the global population. We combine a set of knowns from national well-being studies (means and standard deviations) and behavioral-genetic studies (heritability) to model a scenario of twin studies across 157 countries. For each country, we simulate data for a set of twin pairs and pool the data into a global sample. We find a worldwide heritability of 31% to 32% for SWB. Individual environmental factors explain 46% to 52% of the variance (including measurement error), and shared environments account for 16% to 23% of the global variance in SWB. Worldwide, well-being is somewhat less heritable than within nations. In contrast to previous within-countries studies, we find a notable effect of shared environments. This effect is not limited to within families but operates at a national level.

Automated summary

The major sources of worldwide variability in subjective well-being (SWB) include genetic factors, individual environmental exposures, and shared environments. The worldwide heritability of SWB is estimated to be around 31% to 32%, while individual environmental factors explain 46% to 52% of the variance, and shared environments account for 16% to 23% of the global variance in SWB. Unlike previous within-country studies, this research reveals a significant effect of shared environments, which extends beyond families to a national level.