4.8 Review

Service chatbot: Co-citation and big data analysis toward a review and research agenda

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122722

Keywords

Retail service chatbot; Documentation co-citation analysis; Intellectual structure; Topic modeling; News analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted systematic literature reviews on 386 articles from the Web of Science database to identify the research trends and intellectual structure of chatbots and propose a future research agenda. The research gap and agenda were determined by analyzing keywords and investigating major articles and research topics. Research on chatbots has been rapidly increasing since 2021, with a focus on the theory of technology adoption. While biased perceptions of chatbots and ethical and security concerns are highlighted in newspaper articles, there is a lack of sufficient studies. Studies have explored the effect of chatbot humanness as a research variable, but there is insufficient research on individual factors and strategies influencing chatbot adoption and proliferation.
This study identified the research trends and intellectual structure of chatbots, through chatbot-related articles to suggest a future research agenda. Systematic literature reviews were performed on 386 articles from the Web of Science database. The intellectual structure investigated major articles and research topics, wherein the research gap and agenda were identified by analyzing keywords. Research on chatbots has been rapidly increasing since 2021, and is being conducted based on the theory of technology adoption. Althrough the bias of chatbots as well as issues related to ethics and security were treated as important topics in newspaper articles, studies were found to be insufficient. As a research variable, there have been many studies verifying the effect of chatbot humanness. However, studies on individual factors and strategies that influence the adoption and proliferation of chatbots are insufficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available