4.7 Article

Equilibrium blockchain adoption strategies for duopolistic competitive platforms with network effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113953

Keywords

Blockchain technology; Platform competition; Sharing economy; Network effects

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops an analytical model to assess whether two traditional platforms should utilize private blockchains as an operational strategy, and how their decisions depend on the technology's characteristics and market conditions. Results indicate that the difference in service quality between the two platforms plays a critical role in blockchain adoption decisions. This study is the first to theoretically analyze price competition and blockchain adoption between two platforms with positive network effects, providing useful managerial implications for competitive platform operations of the sharing economy.
The emerging blockchain technology has created many novel applications for platform operations in the sharing economy. This study develops an analytical model to assess whether two traditional platforms should utilize private blockchains as an operational strategy, and how their decisions depend on the technology's character-istics and market conditions. Results indicate that the difference in service quality between the two platforms plays a critical role in blockchain adoption decisions. Specifically, when the service quality difference is sig-nificant, the platform with high service quality should adopt blockchain technology, whereas the other platform should not. When the service quality difference is not significant, both platforms should make identical decisions. This study is the first to theoretically analyze price competition and blockchain adoption between two platforms with positive network effects, providing useful managerial implications for competitive platform operations of the sharing economy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available