4.7 Article

Facile, cost-effective, large-scale, reliable, and efficient fabrication of CuO as a potential catalyst for organic dyes removal from water

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100459

Keywords

Rietveld refinement; Copper oxide; Thermal decomposition; Contaminants removal; Statistical analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent decades, cupric oxide (CuO) catalyst has shown promising results for decomposing organic water contaminants. This study aimed to optimize the parameters of fabricating cupric oxide to meet industrial and commercial application standards. The effects of calcination temperatures and cooling rates on crystallographic properties were studied, revealing the high catalytic activity and potential for enhancing process kinetics.
In recent decades, copper (II) oxide, also called cupric oxide (CuO) catalyst has shown promising results for decomposing organic water contaminants. This work aimed to optimize the different parameters linked with the fabrication of cupric oxide (CuO) to become feasible for industrial and commercial applications, meeting the technology-based treatment standards. The effects of calcination temperatures (CTs) and cooling rates (CRs) on the crystallographic properties were thoroughly studied employing Rietveld refinement and Statistical analysis. The phases are CuO > Cu2O > Cu-o, with crystallite sizes <80 nm. The optimum conditions are 450 ? and air quench, yielding 98.5% cupric oxide [CuO] (54 nm) and 1.3% copper (I) oxide, also called cuprous oxide (Cu2O). The particle size distribution was found to follow the normal distribution at CT of 600 ?, indicating the maturity of the crystal system. The textural analysis exhibited Type-II adsorption. The preliminary catalytic activity results revealed high activity and room for enhancing process kinetics at mild conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available