4.4 Article

Artificial Intelligence-Based ChatGPT Responses for Patient Questions on Optic Disc Drusen

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00800-2

Keywords

Optic disc drusen; ChatGPT; Artificial intelligence; Patient information; Accuracy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optic disc drusen (ODD) are benign and asymptomatic deposits in the optic nerve head. This study examines the accuracy of ChatGPT responses to typical patient questions about ODD. The results showed that ChatGPT generally provides accurate answers, but inaccuracies may arise when discussing treatment and prognosis.
IntroductionOptic disc drusen (ODD) are acellular deposits in the optic nerve head, which are most often benign and asymptomatic. Patients may develop visual field defects and be at increased risk of ischemic co-morbidities. As ODD can be difficult to distinguish from papilledema, patients are at risk of unnecessary clinical workups. Patient information is a key aspect of ODD management. In this study, we explored the accuracy of ChatGPT responses for typical patient questions on ODD.MethodsTwo content experts reached consensus on 20 typical patient questions. We retrieved five separate responses for each question from ChatGPT, totaling 100 responses. Each response was evaluated on a 5-point Likert-scale on accuracy by each content expert in an individual fashion.ResultsThe two experts were in fair/substantial agreement in the evaluation of responses (Cronbach's alpha: 0.64). Of the 100 responses, 17 were relevant and without any inaccuracies, 78 were relevant and with inaccuracies not being harmful, and five were relevant and with inaccuracies potentially harmful. The lowest accuracy scores were obtained for questions dealing with treatment and prognosis.ConclusionsChatGPT often provides relevant answers for patient questions on ODD, but inaccuracies become potentially harmful when questions deal with treatment and prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available