4.7 Article

Prediction models for marshall mix parameters using bio-inspired genetic programming and deep machine learning approaches: A comparative study

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01774

Keywords

Marshall Mix Parameter; Deep Learning; Prediction models; Asphalt; Bio-Inspired models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research developed new and advanced models for predicting Marshall Stability and Marshall Flow of asphalt mixes using four machine learning techniques. The models were trained and evaluated using a comprehensive database, and the DT-Bagging model was found to outperform the others.
This research study utilizes four machine learning techniques, i.e., Multi Expression programming (MEP), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Ensemble Decision Tree Bagging (DT-Bagging) for the development of new and advanced models for prediction of Marshall Stability (MS), and Marshall Flow (MF) of asphalt mixes. A compre-hensive and detailed database of 343 data points was established for both MS and MF. The predicting variables were chosen among the four most influential, and easy-to-determine pa-rameters. The models were trained, tested, validated, and the outcomes of the newly developed models were compared with actual outcomes. The root squared error (RSE), Nash-Sutcliffe effi-ciency (NSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), regression coefficient (R2), and correlation coefficient (R), were all used to evaluate the performance of models. The sensitivity analysis (SA) revealed that in the case of MS, the rising order of input significance was bulk specific gravity of compacted aggregate, Gmb (38.56 %) > Percentage of Aggregates, Ps (19.84 %) > Bulk Specific Gravity of Aggregate, Gsb (19.43 %) > maximum specific gravity paving mix, Gmm (7.62 %), while in case of MF the order followed was: Ps (36.93 %) > Gsb (14.11 %) > Gmb (10.85 %) > Gmm (10.19 %). The outcomes of parametric analysis (PA) consistency of results in relation to previous research findings. The DT-Bagging model outperformed all other models with values of 0.971 and 0.980 (R), 16.88 and 0.24 (MAE), 28.27 and 0.36 (RMSE), 0.069 and 0.041 (RSE), 0.020 and 0.032 (RRMSE), 0.010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available