4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on the compression-after-double-impact behaviors of GF/epoxy laminates embedded with/without metal wire nets

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01783

Keywords

GFRP with metal nets; Double-point impact; Compression-after-double-impact; Failure mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of embedded metal wire nets on the low-velocity impact and compression-after-double-impact behaviors of GFRP laminates. The results showed that adding metal wire nets can improve the impact-resistance capacity of GFRP by dispersing the impact energy. However, in the CAI tests, the performance of hybrid laminates was poorer than that of conventional GFRP under high impact energy and distance conditions.
This work investigated the effect of embedded metal wire nets on both double-point low-velocity impact (LVI) and compression-after-double-impact (CAI) behaviors of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminates. The once-forming conventional GFRP laminates with metal wire nets are manufactured by the vacuum-assisted resin infusion (VARI) process. A novel fixture is designed to conduct the double-point LVI experiment with a different impact distance. The re-sults, including impact response history and failure morphology, demonstrate that adding wire nets can improve the impact-resistance capacity of GFRP by dispersing the incident energy from the impact center to the outer region. Under the impact distance of 20 mm and impact energy of 60 J, the energy absorption rate of the wire net-hybrid laminates is 19.18% lower than that of the pure GFRP laminates. According to the scanning electron microscope (SEM), the damage on hybrid laminates is concentrated near the metal mesh, leading to a more extensive damage area. In the CAI tests, the performance of hybrid laminates is poorer than that of conventional GFRP under the condition of both high incident energy and distance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available