4.6 Article

Optimization of Alkaline Hydrogen Peroxide Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Wheat Straw for Enhancing Sugar Yields

Journal

FERMENTATION-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation9100871

Keywords

wheat straw; enzymatic hydrolysis; alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment; optimization; response surface methodology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study optimized the pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw using alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP). The results showed that optimal sugar yields and cellulose, hemicellulose removal were achieved under specific conditions of hydrogen peroxide concentration, temperature, time, enzyme loading, and biomass loading.
Optimization of alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw (WS) was carried out to enhance fermentable sugar yields with the use of glucose and xylose yields from the pretreated WS as responses. In the first step, variables including temperature, hydrogen peroxide concentration and time during pretreatment were detected to have significant effects on the sugar yields. The results indicate that maximal sugar yields could be obtained while the WS was pretreated using 71 g/L hydrogen peroxide solution with 200 g/L of solid loading at 50 degrees C for 7.6 h. The corresponding cellulose recovery, hemicellulose recovery and lignin removal were 97.5%, 84.3% and 75.0%, respectively. In the second step, enzymatic hydrolysis of the pretreated WS was optimized. The results show that the reaction time, enzyme loading and biomass loading during enzymatic hydrolysis also had significant effects on the sugar yields. The final maximum yields of glucose (552.7 mg/gds (mg/g dry substrate)) and xylose (223.6 mg/gds) could be obtained while enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out at 50 degrees C for 37.0 h using 10.8 FPU/gds (filter paper activity unit per gram dry substrate) of enzyme loading, 88 g/L of biomass loading and 0.3% (w/v) of Tween-80. The corresponding cellulose conversion and hemicellulose conversion were 94.0% and 83.5%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available