4.6 Article

Functional Radiative Cooling: Basic Concepts, Materials, and Best Practices in Measurements

Journal

ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 5755-5776

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.3c01023

Keywords

radiative cooling; functional materials; adaptivematerials; dynamic materials; performance measurements

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the development of radiative cooling technology and various improvement strategies. It discusses the advancement of functional radiative coolers that combine different functionalities while maintaining the performance of radiative cooling. The article also explores methods to achieve switchable optical contrast and provides insights on the best measurement practices for accurate performance evaluation of functional radiative cooling.
Radiative cooling (RC) has garnered growing interest because of increasing energy demand for cooling, which is partially associated with global warming. While various strategies to improve the performance of RC have been reviewed, there have been limited reviews on functional RC, whose functionalities render traditional radiative coolers aesthetically appealing, transparent, and adaptive. In this review, we briefly introduce the fundamental concepts governing the overall process of RC. We then outline a wide range of strategies to couple diverse functionalities within RC devices as a means to produce distinct color and/or optical transparency while preserving the performance of RC. We also discuss approaches to achieve switchable optical contrast to effectively regulate cooling power in response to changes in the external environment. Moreover, based on the factors affecting the measurements, we offer our perspectives on the best measurement practices that are essential for accurate performance evaluation of functional RC. Finally, we conclude by outlining challenges associated with the commercialization of functional RC platforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available