4.6 Article

Overcoming Head Contractor Barriers to Sustainable Waste Management Solutions in the Australian Construction Industry

Journal

BUILDINGS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13092211

Keywords

construction; incentivization; resource recovery; recycling; sustainability; waste management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The construction industry in Australia has a high level of waste intensity and faces barriers to implementing sustainable waste management practices. This research explores the role of incentives in achieving sustainable waste management in the commercial construction industry, finding that incentives can encourage behavior change and lead to better waste outcomes.
The construction industry has one of the highest waste intensities in Australia. While there are barriers to the implementation of sustainable waste management (WM) practices, there is a lack of viable solutions for head contractors to overcome these barriers. This research investigates the role of incentives in achieving sustainable WM in the Australian commercial construction industry. A qualitative approach was adopted through interviews with experts in the field to explore the role of incentives as possible solutions to the barriers presented. The findings show that participants are willing to use more sustainable WM practices. However, the barriers are perceived to be too substantial. Many types of incentives can encourage changes in behavior, which contribute to better waste outcomes. The findings also indicate key stakeholders such as the client, government, and industry regulators may provide incentives, including enhancing relevant key performance indicators, amending existing legislations, and implementing government programs to foster a Circular Economy to improve sustainable WM practices. This study contributes to the field by raising awareness about the role of incentives for head contractors to achieve sustainable WM practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available