4.6 Article

Risk of Microbial Growth in Ventilation Ductwork Located in the Humid and Cold Conditions

Journal

BUILDINGS
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13071683

Keywords

ventilation microbial pollution; ductwork mold growth; night-time ventilation; public buildings; Nordic climate; air quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the possibility of microbial growth in ventilation ductwork exposed to humid and cold conditions. The results showed the extinction of colonies by the end of the experiment regardless of the chosen night-time ventilation strategy. Therefore, the risk of long-term growth on the walls of air ducts and microbial transfer to room space is low.
High humidity inside ductworks could be a potential risk for microbial growth and there is also a hypothesis that lower night-time ventilation increases the risk of growth. This study investigates the possibility of microbial growth in ventilation ductwork exposed to humid and cold conditions. Two different typical night-time ventilation strategies for public buildings were investigated: ventilation rate was either continuously the same (0.15 L/s, m(2)) or no airflow during the night-time. Experimental data were collected over a four-month period. In the experiment, microbial media was released inside the ductwork initially. During the test period, air temperature and relative humidity inside the ductwork were controlled between 11-14 & DEG;C and 70-90%. Wipe, swab and air samples were taken at the beginning, monthly and at the end of the test period. The study results showed the extinction of colonies by the end of the experiment regardless of the chosen night-time ventilation strategy. The colony count in the air was low throughout the study period. Therefore, the results indicate that the long-term growth on the walls of air ducts is unlikely and the risk of microbial transfer from the air ductworks to room space is low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available