4.5 Review

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 205-215

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.45

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Laura & Isaac Perlmutter NYU Cancer Center [P30CA016087]
  2. Louis Feil Charitable Lead Trust
  3. National Institutes of Health [K07CA178258]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prostate cancer remains one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Early diagnosis and curative treatment seem to improve survival in men with unfavourable-risk cancers, but significant concerns exist regarding the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men with lower-risk cancers. To this end, active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a primary management strategy in men with favourable-risk disease, and contemporary data suggest that use of AS has increased worldwide. Although published surveillance cohorts differ by protocol, reported rates of metastatic disease and prostate-cancer-specific mortality are exceedingly low in the intermediate term (5-10 years). Such outcomes seem to be closely associated with programme-specific criteria for selection, monitoring, and intervention, suggesting that AS like other management strategies could be individualized based on the level of risk acceptable to patients in light of their personal preferences. Additional data are needed to better establish the risks associated with AS and to identify patient-specific characteristics that could modify prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available