Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A Framework for Understanding the Effects of Strategic Communication Campaigns
Matthew H. Goldberg et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION (2023)
Harnessing the Power of Communication and Behavior Science to Enhance Society's Response to Climate Change
Edward W. Maibach et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES (2023)
The costs of climate activism for medical professionals: a case study of the USA, the UK, and Germany
August Lindemer
Lancet Planetary Health (2023)
Climate change and right-wing populism in the United States
Daniel J. Fiorino
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS (2022)
Does climate advocacy matter? The importance of competing interest groups for national climate policies
Heike Boehler et al.
CLIMATE POLICY (2022)
The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels
Marina Romanello et al.
LANCET (2022)
Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public support for climate policies
Niheer Dasandi et al.
COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT (2022)
The Effect of Coal-Fired Power Plant Closures on Emergency Department Visits for Asthma-Related Conditions Among 0-to 4-Year-Old Children in Chicago, 2009-2017
Sarah Komisarow et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)
Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil's climate change communications
Geoffrey Supran et al.
ONE EARTH (2021)
e316
John Kotcher et al.
LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH (2021)
Oil and gas companies invest in legislators that vote against the environment
Matthew H. Goldberg et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2020)
Coal-fired power plant closures and retrofits reduce asthma morbidity in the local population
Joan A. Casey et al.
NATURE ENERGY (2020)
Fossil fuels are harming our brains: identifying key messages about the health effects of air pollution from fossil fuels
John Kotcher et al.
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2019)
Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment
Jonathan Mummolo et al.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2019)
Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples
Alexander Coppock et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
How Americans Respond to Information About Global Warming's Health Impacts: Evidence From a National Survey Experiment
John Kotcher et al.
GEOHEALTH (2018)
Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships
John C. Besley et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
A new approach for evaluating climate change communication
Adam Seth Levine et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2017)
Boomerangs versus Javelins: How Polarization Constrains Communication on Climate Change
Jack Zhou
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS (2016)
Do Americans Understand That Global Warming Is Harmful to Human Health? Evidence From a National Survey
Edward W. Maibach et al.
ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH (2015)
A Survey of African American Physicians on the Health Effects of Climate Change
Mona Sarfaty et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2014)
A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change
Teresa A. Myers et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2012)
Exploring the pattern of blood donor beliefs in first-time, novice, and experienced donors: differentiating reluctant altruism, pure altruism, impure altruism, and warm glow
Eamonn Ferguson et al.
TRANSFUSION (2012)
Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies
P. Sol Hart et al.
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH (2012)
THE POLITICIZATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND POLARIZATION IN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC'S VIEWS OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2001-2010
Aaron M. McCright et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY (2011)
Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions
Edward W. Maibach et al.
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2010)
Defeating the merchants of doubt
Naomi Oreskes et al.
NATURE (2010)
Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives
Martijn van Zomeren et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2008)
The logic of the survey experiment reexamined
Brian J. Gaines et al.
POLITICAL ANALYSIS (2007)
Share Paper
