4.7 Article

Synthesis of Manganese Silicide Nanowires by Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 13, Pages 12140-12149

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.3c01894

Keywords

MnSi; nanowires; thermal chemicalvapor deposition; reaction pressure; electrocatalytic; hydrogenevolution reaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermalchemical vapor deposition was used to grow aligned manganese silicide (MnSi) nanowires on a c-Si(111) substrate. The growth, composition, and morphology of MnSi nanowires were characterized using various techniques. The electrocatalytic activity of MnSi nanowires in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) was found to be highest at lower reaction pressure (0.12 mbar). This increase in activity was attributed to an increase in charge carrier transport due to the smaller diameter of the nanowires.
Thermalchemical vapor deposition investigated the growth-alignedmanganese silicide (MnSi) nanowires on a c-Si(111) substrate. Thegrowth, composition, and morphology of MnSi nanowires were studiedin detail using X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy,field emission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopyat different reaction pressures (0.03, 0.12, 0.52, 1.20, and 6.20mbar). The effect of reaction pressure on the electrocatalytic activityof MnSi nanowires in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) was exploredfurther. Compared to higher pressure, at lower pressure (0.12 mbar),the as-synthesized MnSi nanowire exhibits the greatest electrocatalyticperformance (1.2 mbar). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopyanalysis revealed that the increase in HER electrocatalytic activityof MnSi nanowires at a lower reaction pressure of 0.12 mbar is associatedwith increasing number of charge carriers transported by a reducingdiameter of the nanowires, which is a function of the reaction pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available