4.3 Article

Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy from multi-port to reduced-port surgery approach

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1501-1511

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1501

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; Spleen preservation; Reduced-port; Multi-port

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reduced-port RDP results in lower intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rate, and shorter hospital stay and follow-up duration, but has a lower spleen preservation rate.
BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive pancreatic surgery via the multi-port approach has become a primary surgical method for distal pancreatectomy (DP) due to its advantages of lower wound pain and superior cosmetic results. Some studies have applied reduced-port techniques for DP in an attempt to enhance cosmetic outcomes due to the minimally invasive effects. Numerous recent review studies have compared multi-port laparoscopic DP (LDP) and multi-port robotic DP (RDP); most of these studies concluded multi-port RDP is more beneficial than multi-port LDP for spleen preservation. However, there have been no comprehensive reviews of the value of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP.AIMTo search for and review the studies on spleen preservation and the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive DP that compared reduced-port DP surgery with multi-port DP surgery.METHODSThe PubMed medical database was searched for articles published between 2013 and 2022. The search terms were implemented using the following Boolean search algorithm: (distal pancreatectomy OR left pancreatectomy OR peripheral pancreatic resection) AND (reduced-port OR single-site OR single-port OR dual-incision OR single-incision) AND (spleen-preserving OR spleen preservation OR splenic preservation). A literature review was conducted to identify studies that compared the perioperative outcomes of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP.RESULTSFifteen articles published in the period from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved using three groups of search terms. Two studies were added after manually searching the related papers. Finally, 10 papers were selected after removing case reports (n = 3), non-English language papers (n = 1), technique papers (n = 1), reviews (n = 1), and animal studies (n = 1). The common items were defined as items reported in more than five papers, and data on these common items were extracted from all papers. The ten studies included a total of 337 patients (females/males: 231/106) who underwent DP. In total, 166 patients (females/males, 106/60) received multi-port LDP, 126 (females/males, 90/36) received reduced-port LDP, and 45 (females/males, 35/10) received reduced-port RDP.CONCLUSIONReduced-port RDP leads to a lower intraoperative blood loss, a lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rate, and shorter hospital stay and follow-up duration, but has a lower spleen preservation rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available