4.5 Review

Technologies for Managing the Health of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11212897

Keywords

aging; older adults; chronic disease; multimorbidity; technologies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed and summarized the technologies used to support the management of multimorbidity for older adults. It found that mobile applications and websites are the most frequently used technologies by older adults, primarily for communication and connectivity purposes.
Multimorbidity is defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a person, whether physical, mental or long-term infectious diseases. This is especially common in older populations, affecting their quality of life and emotionally impacting their caregivers and family. Technology can allow for monitoring, managing, and motivating older adults in their self-care, as well as supporting their caregivers. However, when several conditions are present at once, it may be necessary to manage several types of technologies, or for technology to manage the interaction between conditions. This work aims to understand and describe the technologies that are used to support the management of multimorbidity for older adults. We conducted a systematic review of ten years of scientific literature from four online databases. We reviewed a corpus of 681 research papers, finally including 25 in our review. The technologies used most frequently by older adults with multimorbidity are mobile applications and websites, and they are mostly focused on communication and connectivity. We then propose opportunities for future research on addressing the challenges in the management of several simultaneous health conditions, potentially creating a better approach than managing each condition as if it were independent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available