4.6 Review

Advances in markers of prodromal Parkinson disease

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 622-634

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.152

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante Quebec
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  3. Parkinson Society of Canada
  4. Weston-Garfield Foundation
  5. Michael J. Fox foundation
  6. Webster Foundation
  7. European Union
  8. German Parkinson's Disease Association
  9. Parkinson Fonds Deutschland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts to develop neuroprotective therapy for Parkinson disease (PD) are focusing on the early stages of disease, which offer the best opportunity to intervene. Early PD can be divided into preclinical, prodromal and clinical stages; in this Review, we focus on the prodromal stage and markers that can be used to identify prodromal PD. We consider the necessary properties of a marker, before providing an overview of the proven and potential markers of prodromal PD, including clinical nonmotor markers, clinical motor markers, neuroimaging markers and tissue biomarkers. Markers for which the ability to predict conversion to PD is supported by the strongest evidence include olfactory loss, REM sleep behaviour disorder and constipation. Markers with the highest diagnostic strength include REM sleep behaviour disorder, dopaminergic imaging and subtle motor parkinsonism. The lead time-the period between the appearance of a marker and conversion to PD-is highly variable between markers, ranging from 5 years for impaired motor performance to > 20 years for autonomic symptoms. The cost of screening for these markers also varies dramatically: some require just questionnaires, whereas others require sophisticated scanning techniques. Finally, we summarize how prodromal and risk markers can be combined to estimate the probability that an individual has prodromal PD, with a focus on the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Prodromal Parkinson Criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available