4.5 Article

Oxidative Dissolution of Cemented Tungsten Carbides in Molten Sodium Carbonate by Addition of Copper(I) Oxide as Oxidizing Agent for Tungsten Recycling

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 1390-1398

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40831-023-00737-7

Keywords

Tungsten carbide; Hard tool tip; Molten salt; Carbonate; Recycling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to tungsten resource monopolization, efficient recycling of tungsten scrap as a secondary resource is important. The molten carbonate method was used to investigate the recycling of tungsten from cemented carbide tools, using simulated hard and soft scrap. The addition of Cu2O as an oxidizing agent significantly improved the oxidative dissolution rate, providing a safer alternative to the molten nitrate method.
Due to the monopolized supply of tungsten resource, it is important to efficiently recycle tungsten scrap for use as a secondary resource. The recycling of tungsten from cemented carbide tools by the molten carbonate method was investigated using simulated hard and soft scrap (carbide tool tips and WC powder, respectively). The oxidative dissolution of tungsten was examined in molten Na2CO3 under Ar-O2-CO2 atmospheres at 1173 K. Based on the immersion potentials of Cu, W, Co, C, and WC-Co, Cu2O was suggested to work as an oxidizing agent for tungsten dissolution. The oxidative dissolution rate for carbide tool tips with 12.8 mol% Cu2O addition reached 57 mg h-1 for the reaction time of 2.5 h, equivalent to 0.32 mm h-1. The decrease in the dissolution rate after 2.5 h was attributed to the decrease in the Cu(I) ion concentration in the melt and the inhibition of ion diffusion by the deposited metallic Cu. No violent reaction leading to explosion was observed, even for the oxidative dissolution of fine WC powder with a large surface area. Thus, this method provides significant safety improvements compared to the molten nitrate method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available