4.7 Article

Application of laboratory-based rate of penetration model for polycrystalline diamond compact bit to geothermal well drilling

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40948-023-00644-x

Keywords

Polycrystalline diamond compact; Drilling test; Rate of penetration; Bit wear; Rock abrasivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study reviewed a laboratory-based rate of penetration (ROP) model for a polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bit and investigated its applicability to field data obtained from four drilling tests in geothermal regions. The study validated that a parameter representing bit performance exponentially decreased with drilled length, indicating that the model appropriately considers the decrease in ROP due to bit wear, except when the inherent performance of a PDC bit is not fully exerted due to reasons such as inefficient transport of cuttings. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to optimizing drilling plans, including appropriate bit selection and bit life estimation.
The modeling of the rate of penetration (ROP) considering the degradation of drilling performance owing to bit wear is essential for planning efficient and economical drilling. In the present study, a laboratory-based ROP model for a polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bit is reviewed and the applicability of the model to the field data obtained in the four drilling tests performed by drilling structural boring wells in geothermal regions is investigated. It is validated that, on the whole, a parameter representing bit performance exponentially decreased with drilled length, suggesting that the decrease in ROP owing to bit wear is appropriately considered by the model, except when inherent performance of a PDC bit is not sufficiently exerted for some reason, e.g., inefficient transport of cuttings. The findings of the present study are expected to contribute to the optimization of drilling plans, including appropriate bit selection and bit life estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available