Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Implementation strategies to scale up self-administered depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneous injectable contraception: a scoping review
Adeniyi Kolade Aderoba et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2023)
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Qualitative Evidence Syntheses, Differences From Reviews of Intervention Effectiveness and Implications for Guidance
Claire Glenton et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS (2022)
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)
Conceptual framework for task shifting and task sharing: an international Delphi study
Aaron M. Orkin et al.
HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH (2021)
A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn't?
Francesca L. Cavallaro et al.
BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (2020)
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews
Cindy Stern et al.
JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS (2020)
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review (Review)
Alex Pollock et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2020)
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods
Jane Noyes et al.
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH (2019)
Towards evidence-based palliative care in nursing homes in Sweden: a qualitative study informed by the organizational readiness to change theory
Per Nilsen et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
An individually tailored family-centered intervention for pediatric obesity in primary care: study protocol of a randomized type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (Raising Healthy Children study)
Justin D. Smith et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)
Quan Nha Hong et al.
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE (2018)
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: a systematic review
Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence
Quan Nha Hong et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2017)
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement
Jessie McGowan et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare
Andrew Booth et al.
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY (2015)
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
David Moher et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2015)
Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews
Pierre Pluye et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 35 (2014)
Task shifting interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Gbenga Ogedegbe et al.
BMJ OPEN (2014)
Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review
Romina Pace et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES (2012)
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda
Enola Proctor et al.
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2011)
A systematic review of task- shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa
Mike Callaghan et al.
HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH (2010)
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews
Pierre Pluye et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES (2009)