4.6 Review

Complement in disease: a defence system turning offensive

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 383-401

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.70

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US NIH [AI068730, AI030040, DE021685]
  2. National Science Foundation [1423304]
  3. European Community [602699]
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1423304] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the complement system is primarily perceived as a host defence system, a more versatile, yet potentially more harmful side of this innate immune pathway as an inflammatory mediator also exists. The activities that define the ability of the complement system to control microbial threats and eliminate cellular debris - such as sensing molecular danger patterns, generating immediate effectors, and extensively coordinating with other defence pathways - can quickly turn complement from a defence system to an aggressor that drives immune and inflammatory diseases. These host-offensive actions become more pronounced with age and are exacerbated by a variety of genetic factors and autoimmune responses. Complement can also be activated inappropriately, for example in response to biomaterials or transplants. A wealth of research over the past two decades has led to an increasingly finely tuned understanding of complement activation, identified tipping points between physiological and pathological behaviour, and revealed avenues for therapeutic intervention. This Review summarizes our current view of the key activating, regulatory, and effector mechanisms of the complement system, highlighting important crosstalk connections, and, with an emphasis on kidney disease and transplantation, discusses the involvement of complement in clinical conditions and promising therapeutic approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available