4.6 Article

The CHA2DS2-VASC Score Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life13102026

Keywords

CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score; coronary angiography; outcomes; mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score can be used to predict mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography, and it has predictive value.
Background: The CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score is used to predict the risk of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that the CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score can be used to predict mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Methods and Results: This was a prospective study of 990 patients undergoing coronary angiography. The median follow-up was 2294 days. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score: group I had scores <4 and group II had scores >= 4 (527 (53.2%) and 463 (46.8%), respectively). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant association between the CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score and mortality (69/527 (13.1%) vs. 179/463 (38.7%) for group I vs. group II, respectively, p < 0.0001). The association remained significant in patients with and without AF, reduced and preserved LVEF, normal and reduced kidney function, and with and without ACS (p < 0.009 to p < 0.0001 for all). In the Cox regression model, which combined the CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score, the presence of AF, LVEF, anemia, and renal insufficiency, an elevated CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(C) score of >= 4 was independently associated with higher mortality (HR 2.12, CI 1.29-3.25, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The CHA(2)DS(2)VAS(C) score is a simple and reliable mortality predictor in patients undergoing coronary angiography and should be used for the initial screening for such patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available