4.5 Article

Determination of Dipyridamole Using a MIP-Modified Disposable Pencil Graphite Electrode

Journal

CHEMOSENSORS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors11070400

Keywords

dipyridamole; molecularly imprinted polymer; modified electrodes; electroanalysis; pencil graphite electrode; disposable electrode

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method using a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-modified pencil graphite electrode (PGE) is proposed for the determination of antiplatelet drug dipyridamole (DIP) in pharmaceuticals. The modified electrode (MIP_PGE) was prepared by electropolymerization of caffeic acid (CA) in the presence of DIP and subsequent DIP extraction with ethanol. The method showed higher sensitivity and lower detection limits compared to a bare PGE.
A new method for the determination of the antiplatelet drug dipyridamole (DIP) in pharmaceuticals using a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-modified pencil graphite electrode (PGE) is proposed. The modified electrode was prepared simply and rapidly by electropolymerization of caffeic acid (CA) in the presence of DIP and subsequent DIP extraction with ethanol, resulting in a cost-effective, eco-friendly disposable modified electrode (MIP_PGE). Several working conditions (monomer and template concentration, number of voltametric cycles, scan rate extraction time, and solvent) for the MIP_PGE preparation were optimized. The differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) oxidation signal of DIP obtained at MIP_PGE was 28% higher than that recorded at bare PGE. Cyclic voltammetry emphasized DIP irreversible, pH-dependent, diffusion-controlled oxidation at MIP_PGE. Differential pulse and adsorptive stripping voltammetry at MIP_PGE in phosphate buffer solution pH = 7.00 were applied for the drug quantitative determination in the range of 1.00 x 10(-7)-1.00 x 10(-5) and 1.00 x 10(-8)-5.00 x 10(-7) mol/L DIP, respectively. The obtained limits of detection were at the tens nanomolar level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available