4.5 Article

Disposable Microfluidic Paper-Based Device for On-Site Quantification of Urinary Creatinine

Journal

CHEMOSENSORS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors11070368

Keywords

mu PAD; creatinine determination; urine samples; Jaffe reaction; real-time analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new microfluidic paper-based analytical device (muPAD) was developed for accurate creatinine quantification in urine samples. The paper device is accessible, portable, low-cost, and environmentally friendly. It uses a colorimetric reaction and digital image scanning for quantification and achieves similar results to traditional batch-wise procedures.
In this work, a new microfluidic paper-based analytical device ( mu PAD) was developed for on-hand creatinine quantification in urine samples. When compared to conventional methods, this innovative paper device is more accessible and portable, it provides low-cost analysis (cost of consumables of 40 cents), and it is applicable to non-invasive biological fluids. Furthermore, the paper-based approach is used within an environmentally friendly assembly with no need for wax printing and small amounts of reagents resulting in low waste production and easy disposal by incineration. Its assembly method includes cutting paper discs arranged into several reading units within a plastic pouch, enabling effective creatinine quantification with accuracy based on a vertical flow approach. The method is based on the colourimetric reaction between creatinine and alkaline picric acid, where the solution colour changes from yellow to orange/red. Under optimal conditions, the developed method allowed creatinine quantification in the dynamic range of 2.20-35.0 mg/dL, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.66 mg/dL and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 2.20 mg/dL. The colour intensity developed was processed in ImageJ software, based on digital image scanning, performed in 20 min (up to 4 h) after the sample insertion. The device is stable for up to one week when stored in a vacuum at 4 degrees C. The method was validated by comparing the results with a batch-wise procedure, where there were no statistically significant differences between both methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available