4.7 Article

Design, Simulation, and Evaluation of Polymer-Based Microfluidic Devices via Computational Fluid Dynamics and Cell Culture On-Chip

Journal

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios13070754

Keywords

microfluidics; simulation; computational fluid dynamics; liver-on-a-chip; hepatocytes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates and compares the flow behavior and filling characteristics of two microfluidic liver-on-a-chip devices. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental cell culture growth were conducted, showing that the elliptical chamber chip offers improved flow and filling characteristics compared to the circular chamber chip. Cell attachment and consistent cell growth confirmed the biocompatibility and cell viability in the chips, suggesting the potential of alternative methods of in vitro testing.
Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) technology has experienced exponential growth driven by the need for a better understanding of in-organ processes and the development of novel approaches. This paper investigates and compares the flow behavior and filling characteristics of two microfluidic liver-on-a-chip devices using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental cell culture growth based on the Huh7 cell line. The conducted computational analyses for the two chips showed that the elliptical chamber chip proposed herein offers improved flow and filling characteristics in comparison with the previously presented circular chamber chip. Huh7 hepatoma cells were cultured in the microfluidic devices for 24 h under static fluidic conditions and for 24 h with a flow rate of 3 & mu;L & BULL;min(-1). Biocompatibility, continuous flow, and biomarker studies showed cell attachment in the chips, confirming the cell viability and their consistent cell growth. The study successfully analyzed the fluid flow behavior, filling characteristics, and biocompatibility of liver-on-a-chip prototype devices, providing valuable insights to improve design and performance and advance alternative methods of in vitro testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available