4.6 Review

A scoping review and critical evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in the preconception

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1122289

Keywords

AGREE II; clinical practice guidelines; nutrition; preconception; methodological quality appraisal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify CPGs providing recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and treating women's malnutrition and assess their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument. The results showed that 55% of guidelines were classified as high-quality, with the highest scores in Scope and Purpose and Clarity of Presentation, indicating higher quality in these domains. Further assessment is needed to strengthen guidelines, especially in domains with lower scores.
Introduction: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendations for specific clinical circumstances, including maternal malnutrition. This study aimed to identify the CPGs that provide recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and treating women's malnutrition. Additionally, we sought to assess the methodological quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.Methods: An online search for CPGs was performed, looking for those that contained lifestyle and nutritional recommendations to prevent, diagnose and treat malnutrition in women during the preconception period using PubMed and different websites. The reviewers utilized the AGREE II instrument to appraise the quality of the CPGs. We defined high-quality guidelines with a final score of > 70%.Results: The titles and abstracts from 30 guidelines were screened for inclusion, of which 20 guidelines were fully reviewed for quality assessment. The overall quality assessment of CPGs was 73%, and only 55% reached a high-quality classification. The domains in the guidelines classified as high-quality had the highest scores in Scope and Purpose and Clarity of Presentation with a median of 98.5 and 93%, respectively.Discussion: Further assessment is needed to improve the quality of the guidelines, which is an opportunity to strengthen them, especially in the domains with the lowest scores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available