4.6 Article

Comparative efficacy of three Bayesian variable selection methods in the context of weight loss in obese women

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1203925

Keywords

variable selection; correlated exposures; Bayesian kernel machine regression; Bayesian semiparametric regression; Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compares the performance of three supervised Bayesian variable selection methods in detecting important predictors in high-dimensional data. It provides practical guidelines for their use and identifies when one model should be preferred over the others. The results show that BKMR outperforms other models with small datasets, BSR performs comparably to BKMR with large datasets, and BLASSO should be used when there are no synergies between predictors and there is a monotonous predictor-outcome relationship. The models were also applied to a real case study on obesity in hospitalized women.
The use of high-dimensional data has expanded in many fields, including in clinical research, thus making variable selection methods increasingly important compared to traditional statistical approaches. The work aims to compare the performance of three supervised Bayesian variable selection methods to detect the most important predictors among a high-dimensional set of variables and to provide useful and practical guidelines of their use. We assessed the variable selection ability of: (1) Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR), (2) Bayesian Semiparametric Regression (BSR), and (3) Bayesian Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (BLASSO) regression on simulated data of different dimensions and under three scenarios with disparate predictor-response relationships and correlations among predictors. This is the first study describing when one model should be preferred over the others and when methods achieve comparable results. BKMR outperformed all other models with small synthetic datasets. BSR was strongly dependent on the choice of its own intrinsic parameter, but its performance was comparable to BKMR with large datasets. BLASSO should be preferred only when it is reasonable to hypothesise the absence of synergies between predictors and the presence of monotonous predictor-outcome relationships. Finally, we applied the models to a real case study and assessed the relationships among anthropometric, biochemical, metabolic, cardiovascular, and inflammatory variables with weight loss in 755 hospitalised obese women from the Follow Up OBese patients at AUXOlogico institute (FUOBAUXO) cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available