4.3 Article

Lung Function and Asthma Clinical Control in N-ERD Patients, Three-Year Follow-Up in the Context of Real-World Evidence

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages 937-950

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S418802

Keywords

N-ERD; asthma; severe asthma; corticosteroids; GINA guidelines; asthma clinical control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate lung function and clinical control of asthma in patients with N-ERD over a three-year period using GINA guidelines. The results showed that N-ERD patients had better lung function and clinical control at baseline compared to asthma patients. However, as the treatment progressed, the lung function in asthma patients improved and the clinical control became similar between the two groups after the second year.
Purpose: To describe the lung function and clinical control of asthma in patients with N-ERD during three years of medical follow-up using GINA guidelines.Methods: We evaluated 75 N-ERD and 68 asthma patients (AG). Clinical control, lung function, and asthma treatment were evaluated according to GINA-2014. We compared all variables at baseline and one, two, and three years after treatment.Results: At baseline, the N-ERD group had better basal lung function (LF) than the AG group (p<0.01), and the AG group used higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids than the N-ERD group (52.4% vs 30.5%, p=0.01) and short-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (52.4% vs 30.5%, p<0.01). Instead, N-ERD patients needed more use of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) (29.3% vs 5.9%, p<0.01). This group had better clinical control than the AG group (62.1% vs 34.1%, p<0.01). During the medical follow-up, the LF of the N-ERD group remained at normal values; however, these parameters improved in AG from one year (p<0.01). Likewise, there was a diminished use of high doses of ICS (52.4% vs 33%, p<0.05) and short-term OCS (67.6% vs 20.6%, p<0.01) in asthma patients. However, N-ERD patients still needed more use of LTRAs (p<0.02) during the study. In this context, one-third of N-ERD patients had to use a combination of two drugs to maintain this control. From the second year on, clinical control of asthma was similar in both groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: According to GINA guidelines, only one-third of patients with N-ERD can gradually achieve adequate lung function and good asthma control with a high ICS dosage. Only a very small portion of patients will require the continued use of a second medication as an LTRA to keep their asthma under control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available