4.6 Review

Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 268-277

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.178

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH Clinical Islet Transplant (CIT) Consortium
  2. National Institutes of Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Disease (NIAID)
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  4. Diabetes Research Institute Foundation (DRIF)
  5. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF)
  6. Alberta Health Services
  7. Government of Alberta
  8. Diabetes Research Institute Foundation of Canada (DRIFCan)
  9. DRIF
  10. JDRF
  11. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  12. National Science Center, Poland
  13. National Center of Science and Development, Poland
  14. Alberta Innovates [201201154] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation can be considered one of the safest and least invasive transplant procedures. Remarkable progress has occurred in both the technical aspects of islet cell processing and the outcomes of clinical islet transplantation. With > 1,500 patients treated since 2000, this therapeutic strategy has moved from a curiosity to a realistic treatment option for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (that is, those with hypoglycaemia unawareness, severe hypoglycaemic episodes and glycaemic lability). This Review outlines the techniques required for human islet isolation, in vitro culture before the transplant and clinical islet transplantation, and discusses indications, optimization of recipient immunosuppression and management of adjunctive immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory strategies. The potential risks, long-term outcomes and advances in treatment after the transplant are also discussed to further move this treatment towards becoming a more widely available option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and eventually a potential cure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available