4.7 Article

Pectoralis Major in Salvage Total Laryngectomy after Irradiation: Morbidity, Mortality, Functional, and Oncological Results in a Referral Center in Egypt

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081223

Keywords

salvage total laryngectomy; radiotherapy; pectoralis major flap; pharyngocutaneous fistula; laryngeal cancer; surgical morbidity; organ preservation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to review the outcomes of postirradiation salvage total laryngectomy (STL) and reconstruction with pectoralis major flap. The overall survival after STL and reconstruction with PMMF is low, but most deaths are due to comorbidities, not cancer progression or recurrence.
Background: Nonsurgical organ preservation protocols have seen a large diffusion worldwide in the last decades. Their oncological and functional effectiveness in a real-world setting has been recently questioned because of the high morbidity of salvage procedures. The aim of this study is to review the outcomes of postirradiation salvage total laryngectomy (STL) and reconstruction with pectoralis major flap. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 37 cases of STL in the period from January 2015 to December 2021. Data for each patient were extracted from the hospital information system and reviewed. Results: The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival are, respectively, 28% and 51%. Only seven recurrences after salvage surgery were recorded and all of them died from the disease. The other 14 deaths derived from comorbidities, with diabetes being the most significant predictive parameter for overall survival. Also, lower postoperative albumin levels were associated with a higher risk of death. Conclusions: Overall survival after STL and reconstruction with PMMF is low but most deaths are due to comorbidities and not to cancer progression or recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available