4.7 Article

Revealing Underestimated Performance in the Bismuth Ferrite (BiFeO3) Anode for High-Capacity and Long-Cycling Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 21, Pages 10853-10861

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.3c01546

Keywords

high energy; graphite; bismuth ferrite; high capacity; lithium-ion batteries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research explores the performance of bismuth ferrite as a high-capacity anode material for Li-ion batteries and enhances its performance through the optimization of binders and electrolytes. The experimental results demonstrate that using specific binders and additives can significantly improve the capacity, rate capability, and cycling stability of the bismuth ferrite anode. When paired with a LiCoO2 cathode, the full cell exhibits promising performance.
The pursuit of high-energy Li-ion batteries calls for the development of high-capacity electrode materials, especially anode materials. Graphite is a commercial anode but exhibits a moderate capacity of similar to 350 mA h g(-1). In comparison, metal oxides provide higher capacities due to the potential to undergo conversion or alloy reactions. In this work, we revisit a bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) anode and reveal its underestimated performance by simple optimization of binders and electrolytes. We discovered that with the use of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose binder and fluoroethylene carbonate additives, this anode demonstrates a much-improved performance compared to that in previous reports. Specifically, it offers a high capacity of similar to 750 mA h g(-1), an excellent rate capability at 1000 mA g(-1), and a stable cycling performance for 1050 cycles. When paired with an LiCoO2 cathode, the full cell also demonstrates a promising cell voltage and rate performance. This work may motivate other similar materials to be used as high-capacity and long-cycling anodes for Li-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available