4.6 Review

Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 169-186

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.162

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [A/15267, A/16463, A/16464, A/16465, A/16466, A/18097]
  2. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking [115151]
  3. European Union
  4. EPSRC [EP/M020533/1, EP/H046410/1, EP/K020439/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/N020782/1, MR/J007986/1, G0300648, G0701533, MC_UP_1302/4] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Cancer Research UK [11566, 12011, 19908, 10348, 19278, 11562, 10342, 16267, 9993, 18097, 10345, 15267, 16584, 22897, 16463, 10337, 21993, 22746, 16628, 16466, 16464, 17242, 16049, 8971, 11359, 18974, 16465] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Cancer Research UK
  8. Versus Arthritis [20000] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K020439/1, EP/H046410/1, EP/M020533/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1302/4, MR/J007986/1, MR/N020782/1, G0701533, G0300648] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-RP-02-12-019, NF-SI-0611-10163, CL-2007-18-015, NF-SI-0515-10045, NF-SI-0513-10019, NF-SI-0512-10162, NF-SI-0509-10143, NIHR/CS/009/009, NF-SI-0515-10067] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Wellbeing of Women [RG1705] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Imaging biomarkers (IBs) are integral to the routine management of patients with cancer. IBs used daily in oncology include clinical TNM stage, objective response and left ventricular ejection fraction. Other CT, MRI, PET and ultrasonography biomarkers are used extensively in cancer research and drug development. New IBs need to be established either as useful tools for testing research hypotheses in clinical trials and research studies, or as clinical decision-making tools for use in healthcare, by crossing 'translational gaps' through validation and qualification. Important differences exist between IBs and biospecimen-derived biomarkers and, therefore, the development of IBs requires a tailored 'roadmap'. Recognizing this need, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assembled experts to review, debate and summarize the challenges of IB validation and qualification. This consensus group has produced 14 key recommendations for accelerating the clinical translation of IBs, which highlight the role of parallel (rather than sequential) tracks of technical (assay) validation, biological/clinical validation and assessment of cost-effectiveness; the need for IB standardization and accreditation systems; the need to continually revisit IB precision; an alternative framework for biological/clinical validation of IBs; and the essential requirements for multicentre studies to qualify IBs for clinical use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available