4.6 Review

Cancer metabolism: a therapeutic perspective

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 11-31

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.60

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. EU (European Research Council Advanced Grant)
  2. Breast Cancer Now
  3. Healthy Life Foundation
  4. Manchester Cancer Research Centre (MCRC)
  5. National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K08-CA175193]
  6. NIH
  7. NCI
  8. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  9. Ralph and Marian C. Falk Medical Research Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Awareness that the metabolic phenotype of cells within tumours is heterogeneous and distinct from that of their normal counterparts is growing. In general, tumour cells metabolize glucose, lactate, pyruvate, hydroxybutyrate, acetate, glutamine, and fatty acids at much higher rates than their nontumour equivalents; however, the metabolic ecology of tumours is complex because they contain multiple metabolic compartments, which are linked by the transfer of these catabolites. This metabolic variability and flexibility enables tumour cells to generate ATP as an energy source, while maintaining the reduction-oxidation (redox) balance and committing resources to biosynthesis processes that are essential for cell survival, growth, and proliferation. Importantly, experimental evidence indicates that metabolic coupling between cell populations with different, complementary metabolic profiles can induce cancer progression. Thus, targeting the metabolic differences between tumour and normal cells holds promise as a novel anticancer strategy. In this Review, we discuss how cancer cells reprogramme their metabolism and that of other cells within the tumour microenvironment in order to survive and propagate, thus driving disease progression; in particular, we highlight potential metabolic vulnerabilities that might be targeted therapeutically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available