4.7 Review

Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins in Senescence and Kidney Fibrosis

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092408

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; uremic toxins; renal tubular transport; extracellular matrix remodeling; apoptosis resistance; inflammatory response; senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Senescence of kidney tubule cells plays a significant role in the progression of CKD, and the accumulation of PBUTs may promote senescence in these cells, leading to kidney fibrosis.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition of kidney dysfunction due to diverse causes of injury. In healthy kidneys, protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are cleared from the systemic circulation by proximal tubule cells through the concerted action of plasma membrane transporters that facilitate their urinary excretion, but the endogenous metabolites are hardly removed with kidney dysfunction and may contribute to CKD progression. Accumulating evidence suggests that senescence of kidney tubule cells influences kidney fibrosis, the common endpoint for CKD with an excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM). Senescence is a special state of cells characterized by permanent cell cycle arrest and limitation of proliferation, which promotes fibrosis by releasing senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors. The accumulation of PBUTs in CKD causes oxidative stress and increases the production of inflammatory (SASP) factors that could trigger fibrosis. Recent studies gave some clues that PBUTs may also promote senescence in kidney tubular cells. This review provides an overview on how senescence contributes to CKD, the involvement of PBUTs in this process, and how kidney senescence can be studied. Finally, some suggestions for future therapeutic options for CKD while targeting senescence are given.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available