4.7 Letter

A functional role of Ephrin type-B receptor 6 (EPHB6) in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

BIOMARKER RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40364-023-00531-3

Keywords

T-ALL; EphB6; Single-cell RNA-Sequencing; Leukemia-initiating cells (LICs); Biomarkers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EphB6 is overexpressed in T-ALL and plays a critical role in leukemia initiating cells. EphB6 positive cells persist during minimal residual disease after treatment and are associated with cell proliferation and poor clinical outcomes.
T-cell lymphoblastic acute leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive blood cancer, characterized by restricted cellular subsets with enriched leukemia initiating cells (LICs). Recently, Ephrin receptors (Eph) were described to be highly expressed in cancer stem cells. Here, using public RNA-Seq datasets of human T-ALL, we reported that EphB6 was the only member within the Eph family overexpressed in over 260 samples. We also found the highest level of EphB6 in a minor cell subpopulation within bulk tumors of patient-derived xenografts, obtained through the injection of primary patient biopsy material into immunocompromised NOD-Scid/IL2R gamma c(-/-) (NSG) mice. Interestingly, this EphB6 positive (EphB6+) subset showed an enriched LIC activity after in vivo transplantation into NSG mice. Additionally, gene expression data at the single-cell level of primary patients' leukemic cells revealed that EphB6 + cells were significantly selected in minimal residual disease up to 30 days from the standard treatments and characterized by high levels of markers related to cell proliferation and poor clinical outcome, such as CCNB1 and KIF20A. Taken together, our data suggest that EphB6 supports LICs' maintenance and progression in T-ALL and, thus, targeting EphB6 + cells could be therapeutically relevant for the treatment of T-ALL patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available