4.7 Article

Electrical resistance-based self-monitoring of manufacturing damage in 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites

Journal

COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2023.101749

Keywords

3D printing; Continuous carbon fiber; Manufacturing damage; Self-monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposed a novel approach for self-monitoring manufacturing damage in 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. It utilized the Kelvin Four-terminal sensing technique to measure the electrical resistance and investigated the electrical-resistance-based damage self-monitoring behaviors under different printing parameter combinations. The results showed the potential of using this method to quantify manufacturing damage and optimize the printing process.
This paper offered a novel approach for self-monitoring manufacturing damage in 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites (CFRCs). The proposed method utilized the Kelvin Four-terminal sensing technique to measure the electrical resistance of continuous carbon fiber bundles within the composites. By employing this measurement approach, the electrical-resistance-based damage self-monitoring behaviors of different printing parameter combinations manufactured composites were investigated and discussed. The results showed that the straight-line and corner segments of CFRCs printed with different process parameters exhibited similar changes in electrical resistance. Specifically, excessive printing speed and extrusion rate, along with insufficient printing height and temperature, led to an increased change in electrical resistance due to fiber folding and breakage. In addition, these results suggested that the self-monitoring function of CFRCs had the potential to quantify manufacturing damage and optimize the printing process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available