4.8 Article

Priority areas for investment in more sustainable and climate-resilient livestock systems

Journal

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01161-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identifies priority locations for investments supporting climate change adaptation and mitigation in 132 low- and middle-income countries. The results show that adaptation and mitigation goals are linked for the majority of these countries. India, Brazil, China, Pakistan, and Sudan are identified as the top investment priorities based on equal weighting of adaptation and mitigation indicators.
Where to invest to help transform current livestock systems towards sustainability and climate resilience is currently unclear. This study identifies priority locations for investments supporting climate change adaptation and mitigation across 132 low- and middle-income countries, at mid- and low latitudes. Livestock production supports economic growth, jobs and nutrition, but contributes to and is vulnerable to climate change. A transition is thus needed for livestock systems to become more sustainable and climate resilient, with clear positive effects on the Sustainable Development Goals. It is unclear, however, where the global community should invest to support this change. We identified priority geographies for livestock system investments in 132 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), at mid- and low latitudes. Our results show that adaptation and mitigation goals are inextricably linked for the vast majority of these countries. An equal weighting of adaptation and mitigation indicators suggests that the top five investment priorities are India, Brazil, China, Pakistan and Sudan. Across LMICs, these act as critical control points for the livestock sector's interactions with the climate system, land and livelihoods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available