4.8 Article

Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 1005-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS3850

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1310138]
  2. US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  4. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-SC0006671]
  5. W. M. Keck Foundation
  6. Microsoft Research
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1310138] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The collective interaction of electrons with light in a high-quality-factor cavity is expected to reveal new quantum phenomena(1-7) and find applications in quantum-enabled technologies(8,9). However, combining a long electronic coherence time, a large dipole moment, and a high quality-factor has proved difficult(10-13). Here, we achieved these conditions simultaneously in a two-dimensional electron gas in a high-quality-factor terahertz cavity in a magnetic field. The vacuum Rabi splitting of cyclotron resonance exhibited a square-root dependence on the electron density, evidencing collective interaction. This splitting extended even where the detuning is larger than the resonance frequency. Furthermore, we observed a peak shift due to the normally negligible diamagnetic term in the Hamiltonian. Finally, the high-quality_factor cavity suppressed superradiant cyclotron resonance decay, revealing a narrow intrinsic linewidth of 5.6 GHz. High-quality-factor terahertz cavities will enable new experiments bridging the traditional disciplines of condensed-matter physics and cavity-based quantum optics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available